Re: GePhex 0.5: why guile?
Martin Bayer <[email protected]> Wed, 15 Feb 2006 00:36:49 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.gephex.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --===============1998896074== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig47973015EA68B7C90243EAB3" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig47973015EA68B7C90243EAB3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi JS, > But I guess we all start to see the limitations and implications of that > approach. But if the core is programmed in C++ anyway, why the need for > a scripting layer? Scheme is a good base for domain specific languages. And we need a dsl that describes the structure of complex dataflow systems. The generated dataflow graphs are just simple scheme data structures and can be the building blocks from new more complex graphs. With a script language it is simple to write complex test cases like: Generate random filter chains with 5-20 filters... Martin --------------enig47973015EA68B7C90243EAB3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFD8mmYCm3i57PRsbsRAj5nAJ9RQJpbxtAjef5lfsejYr3e1/WrmgCcD8Lv Z5puUJILJFLFwBIN9vFS+V0= =WrN/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig47973015EA68B7C90243EAB3-- --===============1998896074== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ gephex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gephex.org/mailman/listinfo/gephex-devel --===============1998896074==--