Re: Gephex 0.5: about the control flow
Martin Bayer <[email protected]> Wed, 15 Feb 2006 00:48:01 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.gephex.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --===============1838536138== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig4C0C5A4452651FE677C05D61" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig4C0C5A4452651FE677C05D61 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > So ... how do you deal with multiple sink? Like, say, suppose I have the > following graph: > > source --> goo --> sink1 > | > -----> sink2 > > Clearly, the following would not work: > > (sink1 (goo (source))) > (sink2 (goo (source))) > > since how then would you differentiate it from the graph: > > source --> goo --> sink1 > source --> goo --> sink2 perhaps something like: (define result (goo (source))) (sink1 result) (sink2 result) But there are still a lot of questions about the syntax and semantic of the domain specific language. Martin --------------enig4C0C5A4452651FE677C05D61 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFD8mw4Cm3i57PRsbsRAvZjAJ0d7JRt0o30gMM9pGrSwqiCgVSoJgCeJ7S+ XjBtDRLOgPrKmIU6knKQEm8= =vqNt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig4C0C5A4452651FE677C05D61-- --===============1838536138== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ gephex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gephex.org/mailman/listinfo/gephex-devel --===============1838536138==--