Re: Dealing with MONO12 images in memory
"Robert H. Olsen" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.graphicsmagick.help |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Rebuilding GraphicsMagick after configure with --with-quantum-depth=16 and then calling image.normalize() got things sorted out. Thanks again for your help! On 11/22/17 16:04, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: On Wed, 22 Nov 2017, Robert H. Olsen wrote:   gmimage.read(blob,Geometry(arv_width, arv_height),"GRAY");   gmimage.depth(16);   gmimage.endian(LSBEndian); The above is coded in reverse order. The depth and endian properties are needed at the read step. Without this you are using defaults. The third style of read (commented out with "//$") resulted in a black looking image, until I added normalize, and then the image actually looked good! But I think something is probably still wrong, because the image depth is still reported as 8, and the displayed image's info says it has only 256 values, so only 8 bits deep. Make sure that the QuantumDepth value used by your GraphicsMagick build is 16 or 32. There is something to know about depth() in that due to my own stupidity it is both a setting and an algorithm. At the C level there is an Image 'depth' attribute which is just a setting. However, when you invoke the Image depth() method with existing pixels it will reduce the effective depth to the depth specified, and when it is called it will study the existing pixels and see what minimum depth is required to store them without loss. A totally black or white image will likely report a depth of 1. Is there some other way of specifying the image depth for a GRAY image? Am I doing something else wrong? Any suggestions for other things to try? My users are physicists who are interested in lossless images with the full dynamic range available. Just make sure that depth was specified prior to doing the read (which invokes code in a coder module). Once again, I really appreciate your help with this. I am looking forward to getting beyond this and trying some of the other graphicsmagick features. You are really close to success! Bob ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Graphicsmagick-help mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/graphicsmagick-help ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Graphicsmagick-help mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/graphicsmagick-help