Re: [graphviz-interest] Moving nodes and edges between [sub]graphs using the gv library

On 2/27/14 5:46 PM, John Ellson wrote:
> So if the attribute inheritance doesn't change, this only makes sense 
> for cluster to cluster moves, and moves from top-level into and out of 
> a cluster? 
 From a layout standpoint, that's probably the only visible effect. But 
subgraphs are useful for all sorts of
application-dependent tasks as well.

> I think this is the root of some of my confusion. Emden appears to be
> discussing things that are theoretically possible, but I'm asking
> about what can actually be accomplished with the existing language
> bindings.
Not in theory if you use the C/C++ or gvpr interface, but indeed, the 
swig-bindings are a bit more constrained.
I don't see anything obvious that would prohibit adding the finer 
control of subgraphs to them as you already have
handles for nodes, edges and graphs.

     Emden

_______________________________________________
[email protected]
http://lists.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/graphviz-interest