Re: [graphviz-interest] Doc curiosity

Hi Emden

Ahh. Thanx.

On 12/12/14 04:28, Emden R. Gansner wrote:
> On 12/10/14 11:53 PM, Ron Savage wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> On this page http://www.graphviz.org/content/dot-language usage of the
>> word 'strict' is not explained. Is it redundant?
> To be honest, 'digraph' and 'graph' aren't explained either. :)
>
> 'strict' is not redundant. It indicates that there can be at most one
> edge connecting any pair of vertices or, in the directed
> case, any ordered pair of vertices.
>
> I have added a note to the dot-language page.
>
>      Emden
>

-- 
Ron Savage - savage.net.au
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
http://lists.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/graphviz-interest