Re: decided H264 is free ?

    Now that the legal aspects arise, will the JVT bother if someone puts a copy
on the standard, lets say, on the hdot264 project page @ sf.net?

    /AITOR

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "tetsuo kosuge" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2003 6:41 AM
Subject: [Hdot264-devel] decided H264 is free ?


> Hello H.264 Experts:
> 
> I read news on m4if page,and surprised at "http://www.vnunet.com/Analysis/1139947.
> 
> --- a quotation from sentence ---
> " One of the initial goals of the H.264 project was that the so-called "baseline" 
> codec should be free of problems with patents. It should be possible to build products
> using the technology without having to pay royalties. I originally laughed at this 
> idea and talked about flying pigs, but it appears that the aim has come true; 
> the baseline codec uses technology that is either not patented or the patent holders 
> have waived their rights to royalties. "
> 
> He said H.264 baseline had been decided free,didn't he ?
> I want to know this infomation is ture, or not.
> 
> Thanks a lot! Tetsuo
> 
> -------------------------------------------
> tetsuo kosuge
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: 
> Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! 
> No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
> http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Hdot264-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hdot264-devel
> 



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: 
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! 
No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/