Re: Linux video editing patents
Robin Rowe <[email protected]> Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:08:15 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.linux.movies |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Daniel, > the video editing side of things is far from resolved. So far we've been > unable to find a free software video editor that we could package and > distribute so that it works 'out of the box' without running into the > software patents issue. What has your research into video (and audio) software patents revealed? Which open source software projects are tainted and in what way? What licenses are needed and from who? > The best compromise that we've found so far is PiTiVi, because it is > designed to be used with GStreamer plugins. Fluendo is planning to make > legally distributable Gstreamer plugins available for the proprietary > formats. Did Fluendo license MP3 from Fraunhofer? Fluendo's press release on their website doesn't mention Fraunhofer. How is the Fluendo MP3 implementation unencumbered? What makes it different from any other OSS MP3 implementation? Robin ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click