Re: RCS for G2
Attila Kinali <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.mplayer.g2.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | NERV |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 21:04:51 +0100 Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote: > Apart from that I am open to all suggestions. But please let us evaluate > svn (and the others) based on whatever merit they have for us developers as > _users_. Esthetical considerations (bloated or not, written in C++, etc) > should be secondary IMHO. As i already wrote, svn's usage is pretty much the same as cvs. The only big difference is that svn keeps a lokal copy of the unmodified code to compare with, ie most operations (including diff) act only localy- tla has a quite different philosophy and thus has a different usage. I dont know whether it's harder to learn than svn/cvs for someone who never used a RCS, but it's definitly a new thing for someone who already knows cvs. Beside i think that tla overcomplicates things a bit. I still haven't had a look at darcs. But maybe Rich can tell us more Attila Kinali -- egp ist vergleichbar mit einem ikea bausatz fuer flugzeugtraeger -- reeler in +kaosu