Re: dual licensing

Hi

On Sunday 22 February 2004 19:13, Gabucino wrote:
> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > hmm, i assume u try to point towards some license fabrice commited by
> > mistake and then reversed that, after _alot_ of searching i finally found
> > it
>
> No, I mean QuickView, but there were/are probably a lot more cases like
> that.
do u have any proof/evidence/...? or are u trying SCOs business model?

-- 
Michael
level[i]= get_vlc(); i+=get_vlc();		(violates patent EP0266049)
median(mv[y-1][x], mv[y][x-1], mv[y+1][x+1]);	(violates patent #5,905,535)
buf[i]= qp - buf[i-1];				(violates patent #?)
for more examples, see http://mplayerhq.hu/~michael/patent.html
stop it, see http://petition.eurolinux.org & http://petition.ffii.org/eubsa/en