Re: dual licensing try 2
Gabucino <[email protected]> Mon, 23 Feb 2004 17:18:01 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.mplayer.g2.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[email protected] wrote: > > It helps the developers. > It helps the developers doing bad things It helps the developers avoiding potentially harmful and time+money consuming lawsuits. > Suppose MPlayer is licensed to some 'pay-per-view' company, and that > company is given the right to distribute modified versions of MPlayer > to their users without giving the right to distribute modified versions So what? They already do/can do it right now! MPlayer's source is open, and everyone feels free to steal, in case you haven't noticed. Would _you_ support a lawsuit? -- Gabucino MPlayer Core Team _______________________________________________ MPlayer-G2-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/mplayer-g2-dev
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 232 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQFAOie5Aq6GhkS0XDcRAoYKAJ4+/g3VXOmySk5VL3ukF9pCOIngCQCgkoD/ zgJOnSbUSlXxTvcdanLNMAY= =h4UM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----