Re: dual licensing try 2

D Richard Felker III wrote:
> > > I am from the RMS camp
> > That doesn't mean you shouldn't think.
> We do think. It's you who doesn't think. You just act on greed.
You said yourself that you don't want money from duallicensing, so stop
saying this.


> > It helps the developers.
> It DOES NOT HELP THE DEVELOPERS. Unless you mean paying Arpi and
> possibly yourself
...
Dual-licensing money would be available for every developer - if they (you)
refuse accepting it due to religious RMS-Rulez-Free-Like-Beer/Whatever reasons,
that is entirely your problem.


> He's not saying that WE will be crippling software. Rather, we would
> be auiding proprietary software companies in crippling their software
> (by including DRM, no source code, etc. while taking advantage of
> MPlayer code). This is bad!!
We already do. The only way we won't help them is closing the source entirely.

-- 
Gabucino
MPlayer Core Team

_______________________________________________
MPlayer-G2-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/mplayer-g2-dev

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQFAOijPAq6GhkS0XDcRAmeXAJ9IrXmAXR239zQBv02JlOCX5VSGFgCgodry
WrJuDQOiTx2Y4ihd2XHy6e4=
=KFMd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----