Re: ogle, medialib, and x86
Vincent Cojot <[email protected]> Fri, 19 Dec 2003 06:14:46 -0500 (EST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.ogle.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Darrel, (CC'ing the list) Here's what you get in the i386 packages of Medialib 2.2: vcojot@host:[~/packages/MediaLib-2.2.1][545]$ gtar tvzf i386.SUNWmlib.2.2.tar.gz|grep libmlib -rw-r--r-- liang/hardware 9366000 2003-07-30 11:20 SUNWmlib/reloc/usr/lib/libmlib.so.2 That's -one- single library. On the contrary, on sparc, you get these: vcojot@host:[~/packages/MediaLib-2.2.1][546]$ gtar tvzf sparc.SUNWmlib.2.2.tar.gz|grep libmlib -rw-r--r-- liang/hardware 31845620 2003-07-30 11:20 SUNWmlib/reloc/usr/lib/cpu/sparcv8plus+vis/libmlib.so.2 -rw-r--r-- liang/hardware 33684528 2003-07-30 11:20 SUNWmlib/reloc/usr/lib/cpu/sparcv9+vis/sparcv9/libmlib.so.2 -rw-r--r-- liang/hardware 29882992 2003-07-30 11:20 SUNWmlib/reloc/usr/lib/cpu/sparcv9+vis2/libmlib.so.2 -rw-r--r-- liang/hardware 31379464 2003-07-30 11:20 SUNWmlib/reloc/usr/lib/cpu/sparcv9+vis2/sparcv9/libmlib.so.2 -rw-r--r-- liang/hardware 20263316 2003-07-30 11:20 SUNWmlib/reloc/usr/lib/libmlib.so.2 -rw-r--r-- liang/hardware 35975624 2003-07-30 11:20 SUNWmlib/reloc/usr/lib/sparcv9/libmlib.so.2 They released many cpu-specific versions of medialib for sparc as to take advantage of the sparcv8/sparcv9/VIS/VIS2 instruction sets. Furthermore, Medialib on i386 doesn't reveal anything really specific: vcojot@host:[/tmp/SUNWmlib/reloc/usr/lib][562]$ nm -A libmlib.so.2 |egrep -i '(eax|ebx|mmx|i686|pent)' vcojot@host:[/tmp/SUNWmlib/reloc/usr/lib][563]$ strings -a libmlib.so.2 |egrep -i '(eax|ebx|mmx|i686|pent)' So the educated guess that MediaLib on i386 does not use any specific asm code is most likely right. Also, a post by SUN Medialib's James Cheng confirms that on Solaris/x86 Medialib seems to use only C versions. http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-list/2002-December/msg00085.html However, the C versions of the different MediaLib routines on x86 might well provide some kind of acceleration as I am sure that SUN really did some fine tuning on these C routines. So it's probably fine on Solaris/x86 to use both MediaLib -and- MMX.. ,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-, Vincent S. Cojot, Computer Engineering. STEP project. _.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~ Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal, Comite Micro-Informatique. _.,-*~'`^`'~*-,. Linux Xview/OpenLook resources page _.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~' http://step.polymtl.ca/~coyote _.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._ [email protected] They cannot scare me with their empty spaces Between stars - on stars where no human race is I have it in me so much nearer home To scare myself with my own desert places. - Robert Frost On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Darrel Hankerson wrote: > Vincent Cojot, > > On Aug 22, you wrote: > > Just wanted to report that SUN's MediaLib 2.2 for Solaris Sparc/x86 > is just out (18/08/03). I'll try to verify if ogle still > compiles/runs with it and if there are any improvements.. > > Is medialib a performance improvement on x86? > > HÃ¥kan Hjort posted: > > medialib for x86 seems to just be plain C code, not using MMX. > > The standard X server on Sun uses 24-bit depth, which means that there > is no MMX acceleration in yuv2rgb from the stock ogle sources. I'm > interested in knowing if medialib would help. > > Thanks. > > --Darrel Hankerson [email protected]