Re: looking for a working 2.0.1 Windows build

On 5/30/2014 10:51 AM, Piotr Stanczyk wrote:
> As you can tell the windows platform does not receive a large amount of
> time. I would urge you to go with 2.1.0 and use the cmake scripts rather
> than the solution files.  I believe you can generate the son files from
> there should you need to, but they should give you a build for the most
> part.
>
> Indeed, I would be happy to see the baked sln stuff go away in the future.

Thanks to all who responded. I didn't know there was a cmake-based 2.1 - 
that should make things easier.