Re: looking for a working 2.0.1 Windows build
Sebastian Elsner <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.openexr.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Over the weekend I was doing some work for OpenImageIO and I found that sidefx's fork works best on Windows. It has all the additional fixes and compiles smoothly. On 06/10/2014 02:45 PM, Paul Miller wrote: > On 5/30/2014 10:51 AM, Piotr Stanczyk wrote: >> As you can tell the windows platform does not receive a large amount of >> time. I would urge you to go with 2.1.0 and use the cmake scripts rather >> than the solution files. I believe you can generate the son files from >> there should you need to, but they should give you a build for the most >> part. >> >> Indeed, I would be happy to see the baked sln stuff go away in the >> future. > > Thanks to all who responded. I didn't know there was a cmake-based 2.1 > - that should make things easier. > > > _______________________________________________ > Openexr-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-devel