Re: Multi-part history

Indeed, there was quite a long thread about that in the offline discussions
when we were looking at 2.0  .. I might still have that saved off
somewhere, but it might take a while.
In short, we wanted to have some commonality between parts to ensure that
there was some semantic that bound these parts together which would prevent
a free for all mash-up.  I seem to recall that the stereo pipe was good
test case for things like display window, time code, aspect ratio etc ...
There was a desire to have a small enough set that could be potentially
relaxes as time went on; going the other way is much more tricky.



Piotr


On 6 April 2015 at 08:33, Karl Rasche <[email protected]> wrote:

> Does anyone recall the motivation behind having common attributes shared
> between parts in a multi-part file?
>
> It seems like the sort of thing that was debated and added for some good
> reason..
>
> Thanks
> Karl
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openexr-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-devel
>
>

_______________________________________________
Openexr-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-devel