Re: Multi-part history

It would be great to have the possibility of sharing a z channel between 
parts. For each framebuffer (diffuse, indirect etc) we write out
a part and we have to include the z channel which is identical for all 
parts.

On 04/06/2015 07:32 PM, Piotr Stanczyk wrote:
> Indeed, there was quite a long thread about that in the offline 
> discussions when we were looking at 2.0  .. I might still have that 
> saved off somewhere, but it might take a while.
> In short, we wanted to have some commonality between parts to ensure 
> that there was some semantic that bound these parts together which 
> would prevent a free for all mash-up.  I seem to recall that the 
> stereo pipe was good test case for things like display window, time 
> code, aspect ratio etc ...
> There was a desire to have a small enough set that could be 
> potentially relaxes as time went on; going the other way is much more 
> tricky.
>
>
>
> Piotr
>
>
> On 6 April 2015 at 08:33, Karl Rasche <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     Does anyone recall the motivation behind having common attributes
>     shared between parts in a multi-part file?
>
>     It seems like the sort of thing that was debated and added for
>     some good reason..
>
>     Thanks
>     Karl
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Openexr-devel mailing list
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-devel
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openexr-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-devel

_______________________________________________
Openexr-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-devel