Re: Informal poll
Peter Graf <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.picogui.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Micah Dowty wrote: > 1. Fixing bugs I would simply vote for that, if I wasn't waiting for the overlapping windows option (Please don't shoot :-) > 2. Adding features > 3. Replacing picogui's build system > 4. Working on the new pg2 architecture I perfectly understand that you can't maintain both pg1 and pg2. Since you have already put considerable efforts ito pg2, I'd say go ahead with pg2 and don't divide your efforts. > 5. Other? Just the (hopefully unnecessary) plea to keep in mind that a major strength of pg is it's potential good portability to non-Linux embedded targets. Some of those targets only offer a C-Compiler and limited POSIX compatibility. Don't leave this market sector to NanoX! All the best Peter ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf