Re: PicoGUI1 and 2

On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 04:31:41PM -0300, Lalo Martins wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 04:19:59PM -0300, Lalo Martins wrote:
> > Please bear in mind Om and Pg2 will take at least one year to be
> > usable enough to be interesting, and twice as much to
> > stabilize.
> 
> ... and this is the optimistic estimate, assuming we can reuse
> lots of code from Pg1, glib, python and E.

I do expect we'll be able to reuse a lot of driver code from pg1.
glib... that depends. If we end up writing most of it in c++, we could
use uSTL. (A more code-space-efficient implementation of the STL)
If we're using C, we'd probably want something less huge than glib.

As for python and E, I don't see how we could reuse code from them, but
I'm sure we'll be using plenty of ideas.

--Micah

-- 
"For every problem, there is a solution that is simple, elegant, and wrong."
           -- H.L. Mencken


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf