Re: PicoGUI1 and 2

> 1. we will fix bugs as we see them.
>
>   In fact, I plan to switch my desktop to Pg1 as soon as Nifty
>   can serve my needs and I find a way to run a browser; so I
>   will be using it on a daily basis, which means bugs *will* get
>   fixed.
I want to use it for my AoF powered car computer. If fact, tonight's hack 
session is building an AoF session object for PG1 (mmm... cli_python).

>
> 2. nothing stops other people from adding features they want to
> see.  In fact, I'm willing to vote on Carpman for official Pg1
> maintainer ;-)
>
Well, all I will need will be about three more of me... :)
But seriously, with a full time job, and my work on AoF, I can't devote the 
time to do the job right. 

>   
>   Alternatively, if we instead keep adding features to Pg1, the
>   inevitable result is bloat. 

I don't think thats quite true. I admit that it's possible, but if PG1 were 
given a dynamic loader system, I think we could avoid the bloat in the same 
way the Linux kernel has. The "It's only there if you want it" approach. I 
realize that this is the meta-goal of PG2, but I think its feasible in PG1.



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf