Re: proposal: talking to the app manager
Lalo Martins <[email protected]> Mon, 5 May 2003 06:48:42 -0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.picogui.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 03:04:37AM -0600, Micah Dowty wrote:
> It's also worth looking at the regowner and unregowner requests. The
> comments say they're for registering exclusive access to a resource.
> This isn't exclusive access, but perhaps they can be generalized?
Looks like this is already foreseen in the protocol document -
PGREQ_REGOWNER(PG_OWN_SYSEVENTS) shoudl do what we want, more or
less. However I peeked at the source and found out this isn't
implemented :-) the only resource you can regowner is the
display. Should we fix the implementation or the documentation?
[]s,
|alo
+----
--
Those who trade freedom for security
lose both and deserve neither.
--
http://www.laranja.org/ mailto:[email protected]
pgp key: http://www.laranja.org/pessoal/pgp
Eu jogo RPG! (I play RPG) http://www.eujogorpg.com.br/
GNU: never give up freedom http://www.gnu.org/
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf