Re: proposal: talking to the app manager

On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 06:48:42AM -0300, Lalo Martins wrote:
> On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 03:04:37AM -0600, Micah Dowty wrote:
> > It's also worth looking at the regowner and unregowner requests. The
> > comments say they're for registering exclusive access to a resource.
> > This isn't exclusive access, but perhaps they can be generalized?
> 
> Looks like this is already foreseen in the protocol document -
> PGREQ_REGOWNER(PG_OWN_SYSEVENTS) shoudl do what we want, more or
> less.  However I peeked at the source and found out this isn't
> implemented :-) the only resource you can regowner is the
> display.  Should we fix the implementation or the documentation?

How about both?
Change the documentation so it doesn't have to be exclusive access, then
implement PG_OWN_SYSEVENTS. (maybe we rename to APPMGR_EVENTS?)

--Micah

-- 
Only you can prevent creeping featurism!


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf