Re: ogg to mpeg
Carl Karsten <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.transcode.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Phil Ehrens wrote: > Francesco Romani wrote: >> On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 14:57 -0500, Carl Karsten wrote: >>> I am trying to convert some of the http://www.thesourceshow.org/node/11 >>> files into something cinelerra can edit (mpeg or dv) >>> >>> like this one: >>> http://www.archive.org/download/AaronNewcombEpisode1-_TheFilesystemMenace_-December23_2006_theora_/episode001_lg.ogg >>> >>> It isn't erroring, but it isn't converting either. > > Why not use the mp4 formatted version they provide? The quality > will be much higher (or *should* be anyway). > according to the site, the ogg is the high quality. except for one maybe. don't really care any more :) >> Uhm, ogg, very likely theora video + vorbis audio; until import modules >> are rewritten (I'm working on this on those days, code will land in HEAD >> during this month), the most viable alternative is import_mplayer, >> import_ffmpeg being a second alternative that needs a few more work. > > -x mplayer,mplayer will work fine, assuming you also specify > geometry, aspect ratio, and framerate info from the first > script on this page: > > http://www.transcoding.org/cgi-bin/transcode?MplayerProbe > >>> transcode v1.0.2 (C) 2001-2003 Thomas Oestreich, 2003-2004 T. Bitterberg >> Please update at very least to 1.0.6rc2, much better to 1.1.0beta0. > > For god's sake, yes, do upgrade (I would say to 1.06rc2)! yeah, for the v4l2 stuff I was building head - for this I figured it would just work. > > You also might want to check out avidemux, unless you really > know that cinelerra is the right tool for what you want to do. > I have been playing with cin for the last few weeks. it has its quirks, but so far it seems to be working out. I have been able to distill a crap load of footage into 2 60 minute final products. > I'm not suggesting that the crap programs available for Windows and Mac > are worth 2 cents, but Linux video software is in a pretty messy state > overall. Still no decent editor, and no decent subtitling program. > Transcode can make dvd's that totally blow away even the best commercial > dvd's, by the way... But I don't know why. Unless all the "pros" are > total idiots. In what way is the tc produced dvd better? Carl K