Re: ogg to mpeg

Carl Karsten <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.video.transcode.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Phil Ehrens wrote:
> Francesco Romani wrote:
>> On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 14:57 -0500, Carl Karsten wrote:
>>> I am trying to convert some of the http://www.thesourceshow.org/node/11
>>>   files into something cinelerra can edit (mpeg or dv)
>>>
>>> like this one:
>>> http://www.archive.org/download/AaronNewcombEpisode1-_TheFilesystemMenace_-December23_2006_theora_/episode001_lg.ogg
>>>
>>> It isn't erroring, but it isn't converting either.
> 
> Why not use the mp4 formatted version they provide? The quality
> will be much higher (or *should* be anyway).
> 

according to the site, the ogg is the high quality.  except for one maybe. 
don't really care any more :)

>> Uhm, ogg, very likely theora video + vorbis audio; until  import modules
>> are rewritten (I'm working on this on those days, code will land in HEAD
>> during this month), the most viable alternative is import_mplayer,
>> import_ffmpeg being a second alternative that needs a few more work.
> 
>  -x mplayer,mplayer will work fine, assuming you also specify
>  geometry, aspect ratio, and framerate info from the first
>  script on this page:
> 
>  http://www.transcoding.org/cgi-bin/transcode?MplayerProbe
> 
>>> transcode v1.0.2 (C) 2001-2003 Thomas Oestreich, 2003-2004 T. Bitterberg
>> Please update at very least to 1.0.6rc2, much better to 1.1.0beta0.
> 
> For god's sake, yes, do upgrade (I would say to 1.06rc2)!

yeah, for the v4l2 stuff I was building head - for this I figured it would just 
work.

> 
> You also might want to check out avidemux, unless you really
> know that cinelerra is the right tool for what you want to do.
> 

I have been playing with cin for the last few weeks.  it has its quirks, but so 
far it seems to be working out.  I have been able to distill a crap load of 
footage into 2 60 minute final products.

> I'm not suggesting that the crap programs available for Windows and Mac
> are worth 2 cents, but Linux video software is in a pretty messy state
> overall. Still no decent editor, and no decent subtitling program.
> Transcode can make dvd's that totally blow away even the best commercial
> dvd's, by the way... But I don't know why. Unless all the "pros" are
> total idiots.

In what way is the tc produced dvd better?

Carl K
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.