Re: a leak (maybe?)
"M. Ranganathan" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.voip.nist-sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hagai, You can use transaction.delete() for the time being to get by but yes this does look suspicious and I need to fix it. Ranga Hagai Sela (TA) wrote: > Hi, > > I thought the stack has leaks a few times before, and it turned out to > be my fault, but this one looks for real. It happens in this scenario > (A is my nist-sip based UA). > > 1. A sends an INVITE request to B. > > 2. B answers with 100 and 180. > > 3. B’s Ethernet cable is pulled out so it can’t send anything. > > 4. A sends CANCEL. > > 5. A’s CANCEL transaction times out. I don’t receive a transaction > timeout for the INVITE transaction. > > I checked the transaction table 5 minutes after this call, the INVITE > transaction still exists in the transaction table. Longer expirements > indicated that it stays there forever. > > Any ideas why this happens? > > Hagai. > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >nist-sip mailing list >[email protected] >http://www-x.antd.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/nist-sip > > -- M. Ranganathan Advanced Networking Technologies Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8920, Gaithersburg, MD 20899. tel:301 975 3664 , fax:301 590 0932 http://w3.antd.nist.gov/ Advanced Networking Technologies For the People!