OK-Cancel or Cancel-OK?
[email protected] (Jakob Nielsen) Tue, 27 May 2008 09:40:00 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.alertbox |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <SPARKLIST-7313542-9880447-2008.05.27-09.40.02--gcwa-alertbox#[email protected]> |
Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox for May 27 is now online at: > http://www.useit.com/alertbox/ok-cancel.html Summary: Should the OK button come before or after the Cancel button? Following platform conventions is more important than suboptimizing an individual dialog box. ---------------------------------- Usability Week 2008 conference > San Francisco, June 16-21 > Melbourne, July 21-26 In-depth training: > 3-day Intensive Camp: Usability in Practice > 3-day Immersion: Tog on Interaction Design Specialized full-day tutorials: > Fundamental Guidelines for Web Usability > Application Usability (2 days) > Intranet Usability (2 days) > Websites That Sell > E-Mail Newsletter Usability > Writing for the Web > B2B Full program: > http://www.nngroup.com/events ---------------------------------- IA AND THE KING'S COINS While in London for last week's conference, I stopped by the British Museum. Among other exhibits, I saw King George III's collection of antique coins. Because this was part of an exhibition about the growth of knowledge during the Enlightenment period, the collection was shown in the way the King had organized it. His Roman coins were sorted chronologically, which is the same system the Museum uses to this day. But the Greek coins were sorted alphabetically according to the name of the ruler depicted on the coin. This meant that coins issued at the same time would be in widely varying parts of the collection. It also meant that coins minted in the same city state would be dispersed across the collection. Not surprisingly, the British Museum no longer uses George III's system for its collection (except for this special exhibit). Information architecture lessons: (a) Alphabetical order is usually a bad way to structure items. (b) For a better structure, you need to understand the underlying dimensions of interest (the King didn't know enough about ancient Greece to correctly place the coins in time and space). (c) New info may cause you to restructure things for better access. (d) Two or more structuring principles may be better than a single one. I think we can excuse George III for knowing too little about IA, but it's amazing how many websites and intranets are still structured like the bad part of his collection. See also: "6 Ways to Fix a Confused Information Architecture" > http://www.useit.com/alertbox/ia-improvements.html ---------------------------------- BBC: Web users 'getting more selfish' > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7417496.stm Report from Usability Week London last week.