'About Us' Information on Websites
[email protected] (Jakob Nielsen) Mon, 29 Sep 2008 09:00:00 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.alertbox |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <SPARKLIST-7313542-11433184-2008.09.29-09.00.03--gcwa-alertbox#[email protected]> |
Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox for September 29 is now online at: > http://www.useit.com/alertbox/about-us-pages.html Summary: We found a 9% improvement in the usability of "About Us" information on websites over the past 5 years. But companies and organizations still can't explain what they do in one paragraph. ---------------------------------- User Experience 2008 conference > Chicago, November 2-7 > Amsterdam, November 16-21 In-depth training: > 31 full-day tutorials Keynote presentations: > Don Norman: Sociable Design > Chris Nodder: Usability for Evil Full program: > http://www.nngroup.com/events DEADLINE to save 10% on Amsterdam registration: next Friday, Oct. 10 ---------------------------------- DAMIEN HIRST IN AMSTERDAM During our Amsterdam conference, one of the more controversial objects of modern art is on temporary exhibit at the Rijksmuseum: Damien Hirst's platinum cast of a human skull encrusted with 8,601 diamonds. I think I'll like the Rembrandts better, but since I am going to the museum anyway the day before our event, I'll take in the skull as well. > http://www.rijksmuseum.nl/tentoonstellingen/hirst?lang=en ---------------------------------- READING STYLES AND LEARNING The Chronicle of Higher Education: "Online Literacy Is a Lesser Kind" > http://chronicle.com/free/v55/i04/04b01001.htm ---------------------------------- FEWEST CLICKS - NOT ALWAYS BEST 2009 will clearly be the year when we finally see a decent number of websites, intranets, and applications develop a mobile-optimized component. In selecting the research results to present in the "Research Update 2008" seminar, we found a huge number of studies of mobile usability that have already been done, and we can only include the most interesting ones in the seminar. We also need time to cover advances in areas like social networking, encouraging users to participate with reviews or knowledge-management-style Q&A, login hints, revisitation/returning users, faster usability methods, and remote testing: > http://www.nngroup.com/events/tutorials/research_update.html Our selection criteria were the intrinsic interestingness of the research plus its applicability to real-life design projects. Here's an interesting study we had to drop. Note in particular two conclusions: (a) Even though one design required more keystrokes, it was still faster, because it was easier to understand. (b) In another case, a design with fewer steps lost because there was too big a risk of user errors. This is an important lesson for all design, whether for mobile or desktop: don't just count steps, keystrokes, or pageviews. It's just as important to minimize the cognitive load and error-proneness of your design. ** Keijzers, J., den Ouden, E., and Lu, Y. 2008. Usability benchmark study of commercially available smart phones: cell phone type platform, PDA type platform and PC type platform. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (Amsterdam, The Netherlands, September 2-5, 2008). Comparison between three different smart phones: Nokia E61i, HTC S710, Palm Treo 680: they want to evaluate which of these are more usable (in terms of efficiency, effectiveness, user satisfaction) for new users. They look at 4 different tasks (call a number, retrieve info from a web site, enter an appointment in the calendar, set up a push mail account and send mail). They found that it was harder to call a number on the Palm (due to a number of usability problems of the interface), the HTC was worst at the Internet task, for the calendar task Nokia was best in spite of needing the highest number of key presses to perform the task; for the push mail account the Palm outperforms the others. Note that for email account set-up, none of the phones had a task completion rate over 70%. Sometimes task complexity can be overcome by good instructions: calendar task has a higher number of strokes on Nokia, but was still fastest on Nokia due to good guidance; Palm users are detoured in the calendar task by pressing a wrong key that turns the phone off instead of going up in the navigation menu, so Palm loses in spite of requiring just a small number of steps to complete the task.