Mobile Sites vs. Apps: The Coming Strategy Shift
[email protected] (Jakob Nielsen) Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:10:00 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.alertbox |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <SPARKLIST-7313542-19748301-2012.02.13-03.10.01--gcwa-alertbox#[email protected]> |
Mobile apps currently have better usability than mobile sites, but forthcoming changes will eventually make a mobile site the superior strategy. Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox for February 13: > http://www.useit.com/alertbox/mobile-sites-apps.html ---------------------------------- Usability Week 2012 conference * New York City: Feb. 26 March 2 * Las Vegas: March 11-16 (includes the 3-DAY CAMP) * Edinburgh, Scotland: March 19-23 * San Francisco: April 2-7 * Amsterdam, The Netherlands: April 23-27 * Washington, DC: May 14-18 Full program: > http://www.nngroup.com/events DEADLINE to save 10% on early-bird registration for EDINBURGH: * THIS FRIDAY, February 17 > http://www.nngroup.com/events/edinburgh/agenda.html DEADLINE to save $200 on advance registration for NEW YORK CITY: * NEXT FRIDAY, February 24 > http://www.nngroup.com/events/new_york/agenda.html ---------------------------------- FACEBOOK ACTIVITY ASYMMETRICAL The Pew Research Center has conducted some interesting research into Facebook users: > http://bit.ly/FBactivity It's particularly interesting that they measured the same things twice, both by surveys and by collecting actual numbers from FB itself. In a phone survey, people reported an average of 227 FB "friends", but when the researchers checked the respondents' actual profiles, they found an average of 245 friends. Not too big a discrepancy, given the well-known dangers of relying on surveys. What users SAY and DO are different: > http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20010805.html More interesting that 32% of respondents were *really* off in their survey answers, being MORE THAN 50% WRONG in their self-reports. So most people were reasonably accurate, but 1/3 were way off. The most interesting finding is a substantial difference between outgoing and incoming use of FB features. Users don't produce as much as they receive. For example, average users sent 9 private messages but received 12. They "liked" stuff 14 times per month but received 20 "likes" from others during the month. 12% of users tagged a photo during the one-month study, but 35% of users were tagged in a photo. How can the average user receive more messages, likes, and photo tags than they generate? Because overall FB use is distorted by a small number of superusers who incessantly send, like, tag, poke, and so forth all day long. (These people must have no life.) The effect found in this study doesn't seem quite as strong as the 90-9-1 rule for most online communities, though it's the same general principle at play: > http://www.useit.com/alertbox/participation_inequality.html