Re: Still in development?

>
> Off the top of my head, I can't think of anything that I would describe as an "open bug". While the current version of Analog was released 4 years ago, there haven't really been any significant changes in the Web log landscape in that time, except the addition of Windows Vista to the OS report, and there are user contributed patches that address that. Presumably someone will add Windows 7 in the near future too. A 64-bit compiled version for Windows might also be more useful now than it was 4 years ago, but that's a prolem with the available tools, rather than with Analog itself. As the availability of 64-bit tools for Windows development improves, expet to see a user-contributed build of 64-bit Analog for Windows. (64-bit versions for other operating systems are already available).
>
> Analog has remained pretty static because the flexibity and customization that it offers comes from changes made to config files, not from code modifications and recompilation.
>
> Is it worth starting to use Analog now? I'd turn that question around - is there any reason not to use Analog? If Analog doesn't deliver on some of your needs today, it's probably not going to change significantly at this point. On the other hand, if you have a good idea what you want to get from your log files, and Analog delivers on those needs, then it's going to keep delivering.
>
> Aengus

Thank you both for your time answering. This is helpful as we decide
how to move forward.

Thanks
Joelle
+------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list:
|    http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help
|
|  Analog Documentation: http://analog.cx/docs/Readme.html
|  List archives:  http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives
|  Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general
+------------------------------------------------------------------------