Re: Multiple ways of accessing content
DRA <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.chi-web |
|---|---|
| Organization | Austen and Associates |
| Message-ID | <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAAUS1rxWIHDES8EM6DAlACvMKAAAAQAAAAZC43lW+jfEij9hWIDqxkpwEAAAAA@hoosier.net> |
Greetings,
It makes sense to me to provide different access ways in Web apps, too, and
I'd be happy to hear any another opposing points of view. (I've actually
done precious little Win app dev.)
Early in my education, we learned about the advantages of giving users a
variety of "points of access" to the same information. We then cater to
different users' mental models. And just their personal preferences. (Per
David B.)
It can also be helpful to provide shortcuts for accessing data and
functionality when users approach a task from different directions.
In web applications we (ideally) show users they have already taken a
particular path by color-coding the links and that can help avoid confusion.
Generally not so with Win apps, I believe.
Of course the trade-off is possibly adding clutter, and risking the
accidental use of different terms and colors and even icons for the same
paths and data.
Cheers,
David Austen
DRA
-----Original Message-----
From: ACM SIGCHI WWW Human Factors (Open Discussion)
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David broschinsky
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 2:43 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Multiple ways of accessing content
Having spent several years on both sides of the fence
(designing web and
windows UI), I have rarely had a reason to design a straight web
interface. Everything that was done by the win32 client,
we usually
mimicked to a degree in the web client.
Now that I am working on a straight web interface for
the first time, I
find myself asking if it's necessary or even wise to
provide multiple
paths to the same content. I imagine the answer can of
course be "it
depends". In the Win32 world, it was originally thought
providing
different ways to
the same content allows different types of users to
discover it the way
they might be thinking of it.
On the web is this the case? Early on I know that there
was much to do
made about creating mental maps of the web site/app but
does that make
sense for an web-based application?
Thanks in advance for any help
Dave Broschinsky
[email protected]
--------------------------------------------------------------
Tip of the Day: Postings must be in plain text
CHI-WEB: www.sigchi.org/web POSTINGS: mailto:[email protected]
MODERATORS: mailto:[email protected]
SUBSCRIPTION CHANGES & FAQ: www.sigchi.org/web/faq.html
--------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------
Tip of the Day: Quote only what you need from earlier postings
CHI-WEB: www.sigchi.org/web POSTINGS: mailto:[email protected]
MODERATORS: mailto:[email protected]
SUBSCRIPTION CHANGES & FAQ: www.sigchi.org/web/faq.html
--------------------------------------------------------------