Re: Scrolling vs. Paging

Sam Spicer <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.chi-web
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Given the user preferences split, I'm a big fan of putting some control
into the hands of the users themselves.
Of course, this depends on the expected level or re-uses (is it an intranet
or google where they will come back a lot?).
If so, then having a preference where they can specify the number of
results returned is a simple way for the user to decide this for
themselves.
Just make sure that it's intelligent, by profile saving or cookies, so they
don't have to re-select their preference.
See Google's preferences for this.

What is the context of use?

Cheers,
Sam

On Mon, 21 May 2007 08:39:27 -0700, Justizin <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 5/21/07, Nikki Roberg <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am currently working on a project in which a part of the interface
> will
>> display search results. This part of the interface will take up about
> 1/4+
>> of the screen (if that even matters).
>>
>> During a group walkthrough with potential users 50% wanted to be able to
>> scroll through a long list of results and 50% wanted to have the results
>> paginated with links to the next set of results.
>>
>> I'm wondering if anyone knows of any research (aside from Piolat, A.
>> Roussey, J-Y., and Thunin, Olivier (1997)) that discusses this issue
> and/or
>> shows that one presentation may be better than another? I would also be
>> interested in other ways of implementing the design.
>>
> 
> IMO no research can supercede user preference.  If you have a clear 50
> / 50 split you should consider:
> 
>   (a) developing a new meme which satisfies the root desire of each set
of
> users
>         ( ajax load-on-demand ? )
> 
>   (b) sending a paginated set at first, and allowing to select a full
> scrollable set
> 
>   (c) sending the full set, but hiding most of it unless a user
> selects to have it fully scrollable.  That is to say, you can paginate
> dynamically.
> 
> In a web application, (b) will generally be faster and/or allowed to
> run more times per second than simply giving a full data set, and it's
> the first avenue I would investigate.
> 
> --
> Justin Alan Ryan, Director, VonGogo Foundation
> Independent Interactivity Architect, ACM SIGGRAPH
> http://www.siggraph.org/members/jryan
> +1-415-226-1199
> 
>     --------------------------------------------------------------
>            Tip of the Day: Postings must be in plain text
>      CHI-WEB: www.sigchi.org/web POSTINGS: mailto:[email protected]
>               MODERATORS: mailto:[email protected]
>        SUBSCRIPTION CHANGES & FAQ:  www.sigchi.org/web/faq.html
>     --------------------------------------------------------------
-- 

Sam Spicer
[email protected]

    --------------------------------------------------------------
           Tip of the Day: Postings must be in plain text
     CHI-WEB: www.sigchi.org/web POSTINGS: mailto:[email protected]
              MODERATORS: mailto:[email protected]
       SUBSCRIPTION CHANGES & FAQ:  www.sigchi.org/web/faq.html
    --------------------------------------------------------------
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.