Re: Learn more, Read more, More
Jim Griesemer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.chi-web |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I Concur with Joan. From my experience with section 508 conformance, it is important to make the links descriptive. People who use screen readers often listen to the entire page first and then tab from link to link. Identical "Read more" links are useless. As Joan suggested, I would go with Read more about [title]. As for the ever popular "double forward keyboard arrow" -- Be aware that screen readers will speak them as "greater greater". Tabbing through "Read more" with those makes for some strange verbal hyperbole: "Read more greater greater, Read more greater greater, Read more greater greater, Read more greater greater, Read more greater greater, Read more greater greater," Regards, Jim Griesemer --- "Vermette, Joan" <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for mentioning screen readers...I've been too > busy to respond > over the last few days while this discussion has > been waxing on, but > that's been in my mind all along. > > You *can* label the links in the markup, but link > labels are not the > best experience. We've talked about doing something > like > > Read more about blah-blah-blah > > where only the topic blah-blah-blah is linked for > the link list. In > practice, though, we've linked the full thing, since > the 'more' is > actually instructive: see > http://eresearch.fidelity.com/eresearch/goto/markets_sectors/landing.jht > ml?bar=c > > > Screen reader and SE-friendly, as Adrian said... > > ( note -- I don't love "Full Story" as a link on > this page...that feels > wrong...) > -------------------------------------------------------------- Tip of the Day: Quote only what you need from earlier postings CHI-WEB: www.sigchi.org/web POSTINGS: mailto:[email protected] MODERATORS: mailto:[email protected] SUBSCRIPTION CHANGES & FAQ: www.sigchi.org/web/faq.html --------------------------------------------------------------