Re: Dillo_grows merged
eocene <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.dillo.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 09:15:42PM +0200, Sebastian Geerken wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016, eocene wrote: > > > > Here's a segfault backtrace that I just got: > > > > #0 0x080ab83d in dw::Textblock::sizeRequestReference (this=0x955e260, > > index=-1224641713) at textblock.cc:423 > > #1 0x080bcd63 in dw::oof::OOFAwareWidget::OOFAwareWidgetIterator::numParts ( > > this=0x9e446a8, sectionIndex=-1, numContentsInFlow=0) > > at oofawarewidget_iterator.cc:84 > > I do not understand what has actually happens (look at the code). Did > you compile dillo with -O2 or -O0? Can you provide a test case how > this is reproduced? > > Perhaps this is related to another prolem: valgrind prints some > warnings, which neither make sense to me. As I recall, I was double-checking whether the textarea row attr default was still 2 in html5 (https://www.w3.org/TR/html51/sec-forms.html#the-textarea-element) searching for "rows ". But when I try this again, it doesn't crash. FWIW, I compiled with -O0. *tries valgrind* I do get a number of "Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)" when the page loads. Searching the page doesn't cause any more, though.