Re: Envolution proposal idea
Scott Kindley <ckindley-/Nmu/[email protected]> 15 Sep 2002 12:08:09 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.envolution.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, 2002-09-15 at 11:37, James Pegram wrote: > > Well i was more going for the breeding ground of ideas approach. Until more people start using this like I do and like your talking about the viewpoint is remain one of a news portal site. > Yes I agree with you 100%. But I also advocate using the right tools for the right job. Being a CMS means being a portal site or an information publishing site. But you can utilize the features of a CMS to do more than simply "publishing" and "portalizing" without the need to re-code and re-tool to become an Application Server. Because unless the Application Server actually performs the functions is directs you to it isn't really anything more than a gateway to the right app anyway...so it is in some respects a "portal" also. But other projects that wish to go this route have talked about implementing code and tools that take the levels of abstraction to such a level of complexity that it only appeals to a niche group in their own user base. I would rather see the foundation there to allow those niche players to do what they want without sacrificing the very principles of a CMS. I think you agree from what I read in your reply. But to reaffirm...you are very perceptive on the breeding ground for ideas approach. We just need to be careful that we don't try to be all things for all people because that is something no project can accomplish IMHO. > Personally, I'd like to see a package that is simply a gutted core site. Nothing fancy.. that pretty much only displays an adminsitration section on install.. Yes. As do I. Taking it one step further if the core is truly modularized this would be what you would have in the first place. This is something I think we all desire to achieve with Envolution. > > Then I could go choose the packages I want and install them. Right now the whoel system is bogged down by modules/themes/blocks that aren't necessarily used. Agreed! > > A package of commonly used ones would be good for those who want it, but a stripped version would be ideal as well. > Agreed! Zoom