Reply-To munging is bad (Was: Benchmarking stuff)
Eric Hodel <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.fastcgi.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 12 Mar 2005, at 23:33, pps wrote: > What's wrong with the list? Nothing is wrong with the mailing list. > It doesn't have Reply-To headers. Overwriting Reply-To is wrong. Mailing lists that set Reply-To are bad. If a mailing list sets 'Reply-To', then I cannot reply to somebody in private easily. (Such as yourself, which I would, if you had an email address that looked like it would guarantee you would get my email.) Instead I have to do extra work to replace the list address with your email address. That's lame. Also, I may send a mail to the list from one address, but want replies redirected to a separate address. Overwriting the Reply-To destroys this functionality completely. Who is the list to say where I want my mail sent? > All reaplies I wrote went to personal mailboxes. You hit 'Reply', right? How is this broken? It seems to be exactly what you asked to happen. My mailer has a 'Reply-to-all' button. Perhaps yours is missing this critical (and ancient) functionality? The biggest thing I can say against Reply-To munging is that a rather well-known person wrote a very personal message to somebody by using the Reply button of their mailer, expecting it to go to the original sender. (Perhaps they thought "I'll just replace the mailing list with the person I want to email's address" then forgot to.) Since the list used Reply-To munging, instead this very personal message went to the list! The list admins said "This is never to be spoken of again", but I have a copy of that very message and I imagine a number of other list subscribers also have that message, and this very personal email could surface somewhere on the internet again, much to this well-known person's embarrassment. (Although it is unlikely, since it was a fan list.) Oh, you may want to read this: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html -- Eric Hodel - [email protected] - http://segment7.net FEC2 57F1 D465 EB15 5D6E 7C11 332A 551C 796C 9F04 ___________________________________ fastcgi-developers mailing list http://fastcgi.com/fastcgi-developers/
PGP.sig
(application/pgp-signature, 186 B) - not displayed