Re: random errors
Stefan Wendt <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.fastcgi.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Joachim Durchholz wrote: > Stefan Wendt schrieb: > >> >> I can only emphasis again that if you want an easy to setup and easy >> to maintain production strength system, then you should stick to >> mod_php. (my 0.02€) > > > Only if all users with PHP content on that server can trust each > other. (Which usually translates to "only if just a single user has > scriptable content on the server".) > > I'm administering servers with customer accounts, and there's no good > alternative to fcgi in that setting. > mod_php is far too unsafe. > mod_php with safe_mode is far too restrictive. > PHP through CGI takes too long to start up. Besides, it burdens the > customers with adding a shebang line in every PHP script, and/or > making the scripts executable. > Hi Joachim, I totally agree to all your statements. But currently, mod_fcgi and php_fgci are no option eigther. Unless you have very simple dynamic content and you don't care about 1 page in a 1000 that failed to get served. Stefan Wendt ___________________________________ fastcgi-developers mailing list http://fastcgi.com/fastcgi-developers/