Re: random errors

Stefan Wendt <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.fastcgi.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Joachim Durchholz wrote:

> Stefan Wendt schrieb:
>
>>
>> I can only emphasis again that if you want an easy to setup and easy
>> to maintain production strength system, then you should stick to
>> mod_php. (my 0.02€)
>
>
> Only if all users with PHP content on that server can trust each 
> other. (Which usually translates to "only if just a single user has 
> scriptable content on the server".)
>
> I'm administering servers with customer accounts, and there's no good 
> alternative to fcgi in that setting.
> mod_php is far too unsafe.
> mod_php with safe_mode is far too restrictive.
> PHP through CGI takes too long to start up. Besides, it burdens the 
> customers with adding a shebang line in every PHP script, and/or 
> making the scripts executable.
>
Hi Joachim,

I totally agree to all your statements.

But currently, mod_fcgi and php_fgci are no option eigther.
Unless you have very simple dynamic content and you don't
care about 1 page in a 1000 that failed to get served.

Stefan Wendt

___________________________________
fastcgi-developers mailing list
http://fastcgi.com/fastcgi-developers/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.