Re: Is the fastcgi project dead - NO IT LIVES!

I feel your pain, Tena. The community has been sometimes slow to respond 
to some requests. I (my company) will be devoting more resources to 
answering questions in a more timely basis going forward, as well as 
chipping in with testing. Those of who have had great success with 
fastcgi owe that to the community. Rob and David have done a great job, 
but the rest of us should join in as well!!


Matt


Tena Sakai wrote:
>
> Hello matt,
>
> > Been using it 24x7x365, on many servers, for
> > mission critical  applications, for many years...
>
> That's great and I am happy for you.
>
> I wouldn't.  I am in a position (and I am sure there
> are many others in my shoe) that I need to use a
> variety of different tools to move larger projects
> forward.  For example, I use postgres and I don't
> know everything about postgres.  I use postgres
> because it has a very active discussion group/support
> organization based on mailing list.  At times, I
> cannot afford to read the manual to do the right thing
> and tips from experts are priceless.
>
> It would be a mistake (costly one at that) for me to
> use fastcgi and get stuck in a land where there is
> little support.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tena Sakai
> [email protected]
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fastcgi-developers-bounces+tsakai=gallo.ucsf.edu-VYFNfGabXYtBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org on 
> behalf of matt
> Sent: Tue 9/18/2007 10:45 AM
> To: David Birnbaum
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [FASTCGI] Is the fastcgi project dead - NO IT LIVES!
>
> Been using it 24x7x365, on many servers, for mission critical
> applications, for many years...
> Matt
>
>
> David Birnbaum wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > Like a long-dormant Frankenstein, FastCGI is staggering forwards.  
> Rob Saccoccio
> > (the original developer), Matthew Marcella (a recent volunteer), and 
> me are
> > putting together an updated SNAP in preparation to link in all of 
> the bug fixes
> > and ports that have happened over the last few years.  We're also 
> trying to
> > pitch in a bit more on mailing list support.
> >
> > So, hopefully we'll have a nice, solid mod_fastcgi that builds 
> cleanly on Apache
> > 1.3, 2.0, and 2.2, and works without any major bugs on all the major
> > LINUX/UNIX/WINDOWS flavors.  I suspect some help for 
> testing/implementing on
> > other web servers would be appreciated.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > David.
> >
> > -----
> >
> > On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, Liyu,She wrote:
> >
> >  
> >> I notice that the website and source code remains almost the same as
> >> it was 3 years ago. Does it mean that the fastcgi project is dying? I
> >> am a big fan of fastcgi and I am a bit worried. Could somebody answer
> >> me, please?
> >> Looking forward to your opinions. I'll appreciate that.
> >> ___________________________________
> >> fastcgi-developers mailing list
> >> http://fastcgi.com/fastcgi-developers/
> >>
> >>    
> > ___________________________________
> > fastcgi-developers mailing list
> > http://fastcgi.com/fastcgi-developers/
> >
> >
> >  
> ___________________________________
> fastcgi-developers mailing list
> http://fastcgi.com/fastcgi-developers/
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ___________________________________
> fastcgi-developers mailing list
> http://fastcgi.com/fastcgi-developers/
>   
___________________________________
fastcgi-developers mailing list
http://fastcgi.com/fastcgi-developers/