Re: Is the fastcgi project dead - NO IT LIVES!

Tena Sakai wrote:
> Hello matt,
> 
>> Been using it 24x7x365, on many servers, for
>> mission critical  applications, for many years...
> 
> That's great and I am happy for you.
> 
> I wouldn't.  I am in a position (and I am sure there
> are many others in my shoe) that I need to use a
> variety of different tools to move larger projects
> forward.  For example, I use postgres and I don't
> know everything about postgres.  I use postgres
> because it has a very active discussion group/support
> organization based on mailing list.  At times, I
> cannot afford to read the manual to do the right thing
> and tips from experts are priceless.

Basically you're just confessing not to RTFM, yet relying
on experts doing this for you.

Well, this strategy doesn't work out on this list and with
this product.

I'm just looking at your last post:

>     If your Apache2 installation isn't in /usr/local/apache2, then
>     set the top_dir variable when running make (or edit the
>     Makefile), e.g. 
> 
>       $ make top_dir=/opt/httpd/2.0.40
> 
> To me this implies that the source tree for apache is required.

The 1st sentence clearly states "installation". An Apache
installation is never "source code".

Robert

___________________________________
fastcgi-developers mailing list
http://fastcgi.com/fastcgi-developers/