Re: Is the fastcgi project dead - NO IT LIVES!
Alex Efros <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.fastcgi.devel,gmane.spam.detected |
|---|---|
| Organization | asdfGroup Inc., http://powerman.asdfGroup.com/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi! On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 08:17:24AM -0700, Tena Sakai wrote: > In the end, however, the quality of the house depends on many other things. > Perhaps, more on architectural design than the quality of nails. Agreed. And I split FastCGI in two parts: first is architectural design (the protocol itself, which isn't require any sort of support or community to use it), and second is a tool - mod_fastcgi for web server apache (which I think require more active community and support). For example, if I switch from apache to nginx someday, I'll not use mod_fastcgi anymore, but I'll continue using FastCGI protocol... and my projects will not depend on mod_fastcgi support and community. So, I think it's bad idea to decide to use or not to use FastCGI protocol because of mod_fastcgi's good or bad support and/or community - at least when you think about architectural design. -- WBR, Alex. ___________________________________ fastcgi-developers mailing list http://fastcgi.com/fastcgi-developers/