Re: WOFF and extended metadata

FWIW , I think this is the best proposal, for the reasons Jonathan lists. 
Erik

On Jun 21, 2010, at 5:47 PM, Jonathan Kew wrote:

> In the light of the WG discussions and the messages I've been seeing on the mailing lists, I have added a definition of an <extension> element to the metadata section of the spec. I'll circulate a new draft soon, but in the meantime here is a sketch of what I've currently got for the metadata extension:
> 
> <extension [id="foo"]>
> <!-- zero or more extension elements allowed within metadata -->
> 
>  <name [lang="en"]>Name for this extension block</name>
>  <!-- name of the extension; optional; localizable -->
> 
>  <item [id="bar"]>
>  <!-- one or more metadata items within each extension element -->
> 
>    <name [lang="en"]>Name of this metadata item</name>
>    <!-- name of the metadata item; required; localizable -->
> 
>    <value [lang="en"]>Value of this metadata item</value>
>    <!-- value of the metadata item; required; localizable -->
> 
>  </item>
> 
> </extension>