RE: WOFF and extended metadata

+1


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Erik van Blokland
> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 11:49 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: WOFF and extended metadata
> 
> 
> FWIW , I think this is the best proposal, for the reasons Jonathan
> lists.
> Erik
> 
> On Jun 21, 2010, at 5:47 PM, Jonathan Kew wrote:
> 
> > In the light of the WG discussions and the messages I've been seeing
> on the mailing lists, I have added a definition of an <extension>
> element to the metadata section of the spec. I'll circulate a new draft
> soon, but in the meantime here is a sketch of what I've currently got
> for the metadata extension:
> >
> > <extension [id="foo"]>
> > <!-- zero or more extension elements allowed within metadata -->
> >
> >  <name [lang="en"]>Name for this extension block</name>
> >  <!-- name of the extension; optional; localizable -->
> >
> >  <item [id="bar"]>
> >  <!-- one or more metadata items within each extension element -->
> >
> >    <name [lang="en"]>Name of this metadata item</name>
> >    <!-- name of the metadata item; required; localizable -->
> >
> >    <value [lang="en"]>Value of this metadata item</value>
> >    <!-- value of the metadata item; required; localizable -->
> >
> >  </item>
> >
> > </extension>
>