Re: [css3-fonts] unicode-range and unicode normalization
"Tab Atkins Jr." <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.fonts,gmane.comp.web.css.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:43 PM, timeless <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 6:06 AM, John Daggett <[email protected]> wrote: >> This starts to push into the realm of saving users from themselves. In >> general, I don't think we should burden implementations with complex >> error handling requirements like this unless it's really a common >> occurrence that's hard for the author to work around. > > Do you mean something like the Font Problems that Fedora has: > http://ianweller.org/2010/07/12/another-double-post-fedoras-fonts-and-more-datanommer/ > > It seems they're shopping for a replacement, but I'm more interested in today. I don't think that's what's being talked about here. It appears that Fedora's problem is simply that their font doesn't have accented characters at all. fantasai and jdaggett are talking about a specific problem where a composed glyph crosses element boundaries. ~TJ