Re: Quick note about future number handling
Brian Pontarelli <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.freemarker.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mar 21, 2010, at 4:01 AM, Guo Du wrote: > On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> wrote: >> Of course, technically, we can change the default at some point in the >> *far* future. When 2.5 or 3.0 comes, we will look around, what did > I think current default is good in terms of usability. FM provide > documented way to change default behaviour for special use case (e.g. > as code generator) and that's good enough. Which default? There are many. Depending on which one you mean, I could go either way. -bp ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev