Re: How stable is 2.4?

Chris <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.freemarker.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2/9/2011 1:30 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> Wednesday, February 9, 2011, 12:30:33 AM, Chris wrote:
>
>> 2.4 has some nice features I'd like to use. Is it stable enough for
>> production use, more or less?
>
> You mean what's nowadays called 3.0 (although 2.4-pre1 was never
> re-released like that), I suppose. The main reason I don't recommend
> using it is that it's most certainly a dead branch. That's also why I
> have removed it from the homepage, etc... where did you find it?
>

This is what I saw:

http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/docs-24pre1/versions_2_4_pre1.html

I haven't downloaded or used it.

The feature I liked was the support for named parameters in methods:

${obj.myMethod(title="foo", score=100)}


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE:
Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen.
Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle.
Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.