Re: How stable is 2.4?

Wednesday, February 9, 2011, 5:59:46 PM, Chris wrote:

> On 2/9/2011 1:30 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>> Wednesday, February 9, 2011, 12:30:33 AM, Chris wrote:
>>
>>> 2.4 has some nice features I'd like to use. Is it stable enough for
>>> production use, more or less?
>>
>> You mean what's nowadays called 3.0 (although 2.4-pre1 was never
>> re-released like that), I suppose. The main reason I don't recommend
>> using it is that it's most certainly a dead branch. That's also why I
>> have removed it from the homepage, etc... where did you find it?
>>
>
> This is what I saw:
>
> http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/docs-24pre1/versions_2_4_pre1.html

But how did you find it? Google?

> I haven't downloaded or used it.
>
> The feature I liked was the support for named parameters in methods:
>
> ${obj.myMethod(title="foo", score=100)}

It could be re-implemented in the real (current) 2.4. Contributions
are always welcome...

-- 
Best regards,
 Daniel Dekany


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE:
Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen.
Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle.
Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb