Re: More on logging
Chris <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.freemarker.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> FreeMarker 2.3 surely doesn't add *any* logging library as dependency > (except for building the freemarker.jar itself). In fact FreeMarker > has 0 required dependencies. Is it still a problem if FreeMarker > supports Commons Logging? > I would say no, so long as it's not in the published POM. You *might* be able to include it in the POM with <scope>test</scope> and not cause problems. That would allow you to compile against it. The theoretically-right way to do this is with <scope>provided</scope>, but that doesn't work because Maven inexplicably carries forward all transitive dependencies, even if they're supposed to be excluded. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Fulfilling the Lean Software Promise Lean software platforms are now widely adopted and the benefits have been demonstrated beyond question. Learn why your peers are replacing JEE containers with lightweight application servers - and what you can gain from the move. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfemails