Re: Galeon2 extensions plan

Jeff Waugh <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.galeon.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
<quote who="Petter Sundl?f"/>

> Luis Villa wrote:
> > Note that basically all major distros[1] /want/ a simplified galeon, and
> > believe that their users really don't want 10,000 options. If the major
> > distros aren't shipping any plugins it's probably a good sign that a
> > sane set of base options has been chosen.
> 
> Hold on, where have you seen this stated? If that's true, than the only
> reason Galeon wasn't included as the default browser in most desktop
> OS's is that it was too complicated?

Red Hat would like to ship Galeon as their default browser.

But they do not. :-)

> As far as I understand, Mozilla was the default in a lot of distributions,
> and it's just as, if not more, complicated as Galeon.  Just an
> observation.

Mozilla's releases compare favourably to Galeon 1.2.x, depending on who you
ask.

- Jeff

-- 
    "Think video. Think text flickering over your walls. Think games at     
    work. Think anything where a staid, link-based browser is useless."     
          "This person wrote for Ab Fab, right?" - Rich Welykochy           


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net emial is sponsored by: Influence the future 
of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community 
Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4699841;7576301;v?http://www.sun.com/javavote
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.