Re: Galeon2 extensions plan
Jeff Waugh <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.galeon.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
<quote who="Petter Sundl?f"/>
> Luis Villa wrote:
> > Note that basically all major distros[1] /want/ a simplified galeon, and
> > believe that their users really don't want 10,000 options. If the major
> > distros aren't shipping any plugins it's probably a good sign that a
> > sane set of base options has been chosen.
>
> Hold on, where have you seen this stated? If that's true, than the only
> reason Galeon wasn't included as the default browser in most desktop
> OS's is that it was too complicated?
Red Hat would like to ship Galeon as their default browser.
But they do not. :-)
> As far as I understand, Mozilla was the default in a lot of distributions,
> and it's just as, if not more, complicated as Galeon. Just an
> observation.
Mozilla's releases compare favourably to Galeon 1.2.x, depending on who you
ask.
- Jeff
--
"Think video. Think text flickering over your walls. Think games at
work. Think anything where a staid, link-based browser is useless."
"This person wrote for Ab Fab, right?" - Rich Welykochy
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net emial is sponsored by: Influence the future
of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community
Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4699841;7576301;v?http://www.sun.com/javavote