Re: Re: [Usability]Galeon feature implementation

<quote who="Casey Winans"/>

> > for images. "Open Image with...  [The Gimp / Eye of GNOME]". That's
> > *way*his functionality) - but in Galeon it would jus tbe context menu
> > pollution. Imagine having all possible image handlers listed in that
> > menu?  That's not what a web browser is for. Just make it possible to
> > drag-n-drop an image from a webpage into your favorite image editor and
> > be done with it.
> 
> I agree... this type of functionality equates to bloat in my opinion (no
> flaming intended).

None taken, but please avoid the word 'bloat'. If it is a cost to users or
maintenance, describe it as such, and why. I think you'll find, on use, that
it is not a significant cost, for a significant gain (that users know,
immediately, that they can open these files in other programs - how are they
to know that they can drag an image in a page? this way, they will find it
when they go to save, because their next move is very likely to be opening
it in another piece of software anyway).

- Jeff

-- 
    I wanted to be Superman, but all I got were these special powers of     
                             self-deprecation.                              


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm 
Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size!
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en