Re: Re: Galeon input unlike GNU readline

"John A. Martin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.galeon.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

>>>>> "Tommi" == Tommi Komulainen
>>>>> "Re: [Galeon-devel] Re: Galeon input unlike GNU readline"
>>>>>  Tue, 02 Sep 2003 14:49:10 +0300

    Tommi> On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 18:00, Mark Howard wrote:
    >> On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 10:34:40AM -0400, John A. Martin wrote:
    >> > Several months ago Galeon changed in such a way that typing
    >> > into the location window, and into other input forms
    >> > presented to the user, changed from behaving like an Emacs
    >> > style readline input to something wildly different,
    >> > confusing, and prone to drive [[one]] to detraction ....

    >> Sending to galeon-devel for their comments.

NB. I'm not on the galeon-devel list.

    Tommi> Enabling Emacs bindings from gnome-control-center should
    Tommi> help somewhat, but there's a problem the HIG is wildly
    Tommi> conflicting when it comes to standard application shortcuts
    Tommi> and Emacs keybindings.  Ctrl+A is both Select All and Move
    Tommi> to BOL, Ctrl+W is both Close document and Cut to clipboard.

    Tommi> And basically we don't even have a say in this; the
    Tommi> shortcuts we define (following the HIG) for the menu items
    Tommi> are automatically handled by
    Tommi> bonobo/gtk/that-guy-in-the-basement, it would require extra
    Tommi> workarounds with emacs bindings (assuming it's even
    Tommi> possible.)

Mozilla has done The Right Thing whenever I tried it.  I see
statements to the contrary in the bug listed below but it has worked
for me.  Mozilla-firebird also does it right and Galeon used to do it
right.

    Tommi> So yes, the answer is "it shouldn't be our problem, it
    Tommi> should be handled in a lower level."  Unfortunately there
    Tommi> just doesn't seem to be anyone using Emacs bindings
    Tommi> bothered enough to actually fix it, work around it, or
    Tommi> declare it unsupported :-/

    Tommi> See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100636

,----[ Excerpt from above bug#100636 ]
 ------- Additional Comments From Philip Langdale 2003-08-02 09:53 -------

This, one hopes will be solved when I rip and out and replace the menu
system, so I'm taking this.
`----

The original gnome.org bug was entered on 2002-12-07 and a Debian bug
#183122 opened on 2 Mar 2003 has been folded in.

Does the comment from Philip Langdale suggest that one should be
expecting a fix any time soon?  If so, what might 'soon' mean?

        jam

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQE/VKaQUEvv1b/iXy8RAmLdAJoDYpXovJXNdVahDM/gStYiEf6VeQCfTxsH
dxyB3FLz/G98qrEFz50TUMo=
=41Lr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.