Re: Ideas/Regressions
Tommi Komulainen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.galeon.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 2002-10-12 at 12:21, [email protected] wrote: > >-- Messaggio originale -- > >Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 21:59:08 +0200 > >From: Erich Schubert <[email protected]> > > > >Marco: you said yourself that most of your family and friends don't know > >what javascript is etc. - but are they actually harmed by the menu > >entry? I don't think so. > > They are for many reasons: > - Many menus add menu clutter and menu clutter is really bad for usability ...and putting somewhat frequently needed functionality in some tab inside a dialog that is reachable from the menus is just as bad. I'd be more than happy to remove the whole option myself and have JS always enabled if simply worked. But the Internet is broken. There are too many sites that use JS for all the wrong things. And many of those who can use JS right, write it compatible with IE only and similar shortcomings. Unfortunately, until everything "just works" we need that option. If you don't need that, good for you, but some of us do. > - An ui exposing complex implementation details (javascript is an implementation > detail of web pages) that many user cannot understand doesnt certainly improve > their feel with the application. And cookies aren't? (see the PDM) Though, if you can get the java/javascript console popped up using 'javascript:' URL as you said in your other mail, 'cookies:' for PDM might work as well. You can use bookmarks to access those, but that presents another problem: the bookmark can be removed way too easily (at the moment, at least.) Whether that is a real problem, I'm uncertain. But there is a reason why user can't accidently remove items from menus. > - There is the risk an user accidentally enable this option (with menus > is easy) and then he would probably never understand himself why web pages > doesnt work anymore Ok, this can be somewhat of a problem since there is no visual indication for how javascript affects the looks of the web pages. But has anyone really complained about that? It's a mistake you usually make only once, and even that only if you go turning knobs you know nothing about. -- Tommi Komulainen [email protected] GPG 1024D/68388EE6 6FD6 DD79 EB38 BF6F 3533 09C0 04A8 9871 6838 8EE6
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA9p/D8BKiYcWg4juYRAk6FAJ9V9jvA7Fzv1K4fPNb7B4tcGEeMGgCfVXqB lDqqFTHlk5J07PHncLs97D8= =NCmU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----