Re: Open-frame-in... functions don't.

"Karsten M. Self" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.galeon.user
Message-ID <20041216093425.GA11813@localhost>
on Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 03:54:18PM +0000, Crispin Flowerday ([email protected]) wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-12-14 at 22:10 -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > Galeon 1.3.18-1.1 (Debian testing/unstable x86).
> > 
> > The context menu "View frame" functions which AFAICT are supposed to
> > open the current frame:
> > 
> >     "Open Frame"                    In current tab
> >     "Open Frame in new tab"         In new tab
> >     "Open Frame in new window"      In new window
> > 
> > ...don't.  Best I seem to get is a page reload.
> > 
> > In fact, there's no way to tell what the URL of the current frame is
> > other than reading the document source and guessing.
> 
> There is a bug at the moment, I believe you first need to left click on
> a frame before right clicking to get the context menu:
> 
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149566

I'm somewhat glad to hear that, because I *swear* I was having the
problem.  It appears to be a bit of a Heisenbug.

One possible conflating factor:  I'm running a current 3.1.17 Galeon
session (up since Dec 8), but 3.1.18 is the currently installed version.
I've seen some oddments in the past in Firefox when it got upgraded from
underneath.
 
> If you don't left click, then the currently focused document is the
> toplevel one, so those frame operation act on the entire page, not just
> the frame you clicked in.

I'd right, left, middle, and in-ways-not-describable-in-a-family-mailing-
list clicked the page(s) in question.
 
> I'll see if I can fix it right now :-)

Two sites I'm looking at, and one may be coded so's not to use standard
frames:

    http://www.sconsig.com   (standard frames)
    http://www.madville.com  (iframe?)

In the case of Madville, link to one of the referenced stories, e.g.:

    http://www.madville.com/link.php?id=86878&t=7

I *think* the problem there may be some sort of enforced framing.
Which, incidentally, is really maddening.  Fortunatly, well, it's
Madville.  And of course, hardly worth reading.


Peace.

-- 
Karsten M. Self <[email protected]>        http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
 What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?
    You know, maybe FSF should just rebrand emacs as the hurd and stick
    a fork() in it...
    - Karsten M. Self, on linux-elitists
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBwVahefG8443k044RAnRbAJ9iHxVwAfVMxwtIEDAZ7EVqYZtZKgCfX9az
2nyYbVH9n4ge+LCfn5Exewk=
=Gv9I
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.