Re: 3.1.6 vs. 3.2.0b5 speed test results

Gabriele Bartolini <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.htdig.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
At 11.00 02/06/2004, Ted Stresen-Reuter wrote:
>In an unscientific test, it appears that 3.2.0b5 is about 20% faster than 
>3.1.6 at digging (indexing) a site on Mac OS X (10.3.4).
>
>The test consisted of modifying the default htdig.conf file to include 
>"robotstxt_name: master-htdig" (the "big dig") in order to get more 
>accurate results.

Thanks Ted. Your results are reassuring! :-)

I will go on with the release process by sunday.

Ciao,
-Gabriele
--
Gabriele Bartolini: Web Programmer, ht://Dig & IWA/HWG Member, ht://Check 
maintainer
Current Location: Prato, Toscana, Italia
[email protected] | http://www.prato.linux.it/~gbartolini | ICQ#129221447
 > "Leave every hope, ye who enter!", Dante Alighieri, Divine Comedy, The 
Inferno



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X.
From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the one
installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and
evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504
_______________________________________________
ht://Dig Developer mailing list:
[email protected]
List information (subscribe/unsubscribe, etc.)
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.